Evolution of whale hearing unfolds in fossil record

Posted 11 August 2004 by

↗ The current version of this post is on the live site: https://pandasthumb.org/archives/2004/08/evolution-of-wh.html

http://www.eurekalert.org/images/release_graphics/nsf080904.1sm.jpgStudies of the fossil record along with genetic data for Cetacea (Whales, dolphins and their allies) offers some of the best examples of evolutionary studies generating testable, refutable, hypotheses regarding the development of organic diversity. Many readers will perhaps remember Carl Zimmer’s wonderful exposition in At The Water’s Edge (Amazon), but a lot has happened since Zimmer was writing in 1999, with interesting articles appearing in journals such as Systematic Biology, Paleobiology, and Evolution and Development. In the August 12th edition of Nature, a study of the early evolution of whales demonstrates the changes that took place in whales’ outer and middle ears, required for the transition from a land-based to a marine-based existence. From EurekAlert:

The ear is the most important sense organ for modern toothed whales, say scientists, because these whales locate their prey using echolocation. Directional hearing is critical: A blind whale could find food without much trouble; a deaf one would starve.

The study documents how hearing in these whales evolved. The research is based on cetacean fossils representing four groups of early whales. The earliest cetaceans, pakicetids (those that swam in ancient seas 50 million years ago), used the same sound transmission system as did land mammals, and so had poor underwater hearing. More recent cetaceans, remingtonocetids and protocetids (those that lived 43-46 million years ago), retained the land-mammal system, but also developed a new sound transmission system.

“The fossils document the ways in which cetacean hearing has changed, starting with ear fossils of whales’ land ancestors and ending with the ear of near-modern looking whales,” said Hans Thewissen, an anatomist at the Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine (NEOUCOM). Thewissen and NEOUCOM researcher Sirpa Nummela led the study.

The newer system was similar to that of modern whales. The later whales could hear better in water than pakicetids could, and could also hear in air, but hearing in both media was compromised by the existence of two systems. With the advent of basilosauroids (approximately 40 million years ago), the old land-mammal ear disappeared, and the modern cetacean sound transmission system began its development. Although basilosaurids were not echolocators (they lacked the sound-emission equipment of later echolocators), they had taken a major step forward in refining underwater sound reception.

The paper in question is S. Nummela et al. “Eocene evolution of whale hearing” Nature Vol 430, No 7001, pp 776-778 (doi:10.1038/nature02720). Abstract reads:

The origin of whales (order Cetacea) is one of the best-documented examples of macroevolutionary change in vertebrates. As the earliest whales became obligately marine, all of their organ systems adapted to the new environment. The fossil record indicates that this evolutionary transition took less than 15 million years, and that different organ systems followed different evolutionary trajectories. Here we document the evolutionary changes that took place in the sound transmission mechanism of the outer and middle ear in early whales. Sound transmission mechanisms change early on in whale evolution and pass through a stage (in pakicetids) in which hearing in both air and water is unsophisticated. This intermediate stage is soon abandoned and is replaced (in remingtonocetids and protocetids) by a sound transmission mechanism similar to that in modern toothed whales. The mechanism of these fossil whales lacks sophistication, and still retains some of the key elements that land mammals use to hear airborne sound.

Those with access to the journal can read the article here

12 Comments

steve · 11 August 2004

The research is based on cetacean fossils representing four groups of early whales. The earliest cetaceans, pakicetids (those that swam in ancient seas 50 million years ago), used the same sound transmission system as did land mammals, and so had poor underwater hearing. More recent cetaceans, remingtonocetids and protocetids (those that lived 43-46 million years ago), retained the land-mammal system, but also developed a new sound transmission system.

Wow. Just like ID predicted! Another stunning confirmation of ID Theory. Like all great theories, it implies unique, specific predictions, which are subsequently verified over time. Soon, only a tiny fringe of dogmatic scientists will refuse to believe it, and they will be left in the dust. That process is clearly underway. Science marches on.

G3 · 12 August 2004

unique, specific predictions, which are subsequently verified over time

— Steve
That is really dumb Steve. Scientists wasted their time by noticing that whales are mammals, have hip bones, etc. Then they hypothesis that whales evolved from land animals and are now wasting their time looking for fossil and DNA evidence. What they should be doing is debating - debates are the way to find the truth! [/sarcasm] [serious] John, thanks for the article. Does anyone have more pictures/explanations of the changes in the ear for those of us without journal access. I'm especially interested in 'hearing' ;-) how the the cetacean ear got its start - was it from the earlier ear or a separate system that started out with something like sound transmission through jawbones? [off topic] It would be also be interesting if anyone has a writeup of the implications for this research: Sequencing of organims that were selected because each organism represents an important position on the evolutionary tree and therefore will contribute a sequence that will be particularly important in helping to interpret the human genome That is the sort of project that would even attract a fair amount of popular press attention. It might be good to brief some members of the press on what sort of results would invalidate evolution as well as what sort of benefits we expect from the knowledge. Then, when the sequencing is done, brief the press again on the results and how they validate or invalidate evolution.

steve · 12 August 2004

(eyeroll) Once again, G, you're way off. Scientists should follow the Scientific Method, New and Improved by ID Theorists.

1 Claim they have a theory, which will mostly be published sometime later
2 'invent' some new math which already exists
3 claim it will be shown to destroy the regnant theory
4 forgo publishing in the literature
5 declare success, and start lobbying school boards

Reed A. Cartwright · 12 August 2004

There has to be a pun somewhere in there about "Alls whales that ends whales."

john m lynch · 12 August 2004

Reed:

Got to your room and think about what you've done!

Bob Maurus · 12 August 2004

Yeah, Reed, there was absolutely no porpoise in that pun.

Bob Maurus · 12 August 2004

Yeah Reed. There was absolutely on porpoise in that pun!

Bob Maurus · 12 August 2004

Oh, whale - I swear the first post didn't show up until I waited and tried again. Really

Rich White · 13 August 2004

The ear structure is just the latest info on the whale story. Much more impressive to me, becases it show more directly from whence came whales, is the structure of the hind foot of the primitive whales. The double-trochleated astragalus, confined among all other mammals, living and extinct, to the Artiodactyla (two toed ungulates:deer, sheep, bovids, graffes and HIPPOs) is an amazing demonstration of the relationship of early whales to artiodactyla. And dna folk had been saying that whales were related to hippos for quite some time prior to those foot bones being discovered.

Ain't science wonderful?

Rich

Wesley R. Elsberry · 13 August 2004

Winthrop Kellogg had noted the Artiodactyl connection in the 1950s.

Frank J · 16 August 2004

Oh, whale - I swear the first post didn't show up until I waited and tried again. Really

— Bob Maurus
Sorry, I can't resist, but, where there's a whale there's a way.

Rich · 9 November 2004

Posted by Wesley R. Elsberry on August 13, 2004 01:25 PM

Winthrop Kellogg had noted the Artiodactyl connection in the 1950s.

You mean Remington Kellogg, I presume?

Rich