Over on the Philosophy of Biology blog Michael Ruse has just written an extensive eulogy of Ernst Mayr. It includes an excellent summary of the importance of Mayr as well as many entertaining anecdotes.
I recently expressed the view that I would be proud to be kicked by Ernst Mayr. It seems that Ruse felt the same way:
But Mayr had many more years of active life. Even last year he was scrounging one of my books from our shared publisher, Harvard University Press, so that he could put the boot into me one more time before he was done. Michael Ruse, Ernst Mayr Eulogy
I have quoted some of the important points and good bits below, but you should really read the whole thing.
4 Comments
Nick (Matzke) · 6 February 2005
Steve F · 6 February 2005
Excellent piece. Thanks for the link Nick.
Chip Poirot · 8 February 2005
As an economist, I greatly appreciate Ernst Mayr (or rather, his writings). In the last year I had the good fortune to stumble onto two of his books "What Evolution Is" and "This is Biology". I've also had the good fortune to meet Michael Ruse a couple of years when he spoke at my University and to read several of Ruse's books.
Economics has long fancied itself a science like physics. A few of us have long argue that it should try to be a science like Biology. Of course, Thorstein Veblen had a famous essay at the turn of the century "Why Economics is not an Evolutionary Science". And then there are those who argue it cannot and should not be a science at all (Which is an altogether different subject).
But in that light, I deeply appreciate Mayr's insights and arguments about why Biology is autonomous and I agree wholeheartedly with his anti-reductionism (holism) which is better termed "emergentism". I also find Mayr's writing to be very clear so that for those of us interested in Biology who lack formal training, Mayr's writings are a great introduction to complex subjects.
Chip Poirot · 8 February 2005
As an economist, I greatly appreciate Ernst Mayr (or rather, his writings). In the last year I had the good fortune to stumble onto two of his books "What Evolution Is" and "This is Biology". I've also had the good fortune to meet Michael Ruse a couple of years when he spoke at my University and to read several of Ruse's books.
Economics has long fancied itself a science like physics. A few of us have long argue that it should try to be a science like Biology. Of course, Thorstein Veblen had a famous essay at the turn of the century "Why Economics is not an Evolutionary Science". And then there are those who argue it cannot and should not be a science at all (Which is an altogether different subject).
But in that light, I deeply appreciate Mayr's insights and arguments about why Biology is autonomous and I agree wholeheartedly with his anti-reductionism (holism) which is better termed "emergentism". I also find Mayr's writing to be very clear so that for those of us interested in Biology who lack formal training, Mayr's writings are a great introduction to complex subjects.