The Pensacola News-Journal is doing fantastic work keeping us up to date on the Hovind story. A longer and more detailed story came out today. Some of the more interesting/scary bits:
Yet more:Of the 58 charges, 44 were filed against Kent Hovind and his wife, Jo, for evading bank reporting requirements as they withdrew $430,500 from AmSouth Bank between July 20, 2001, and Aug. 9, 2002. At the couple's first court appearance Thursday before U.S. Magistrate Judge Miles Davis, Kent Hovind professed not to understand why he is being prosecuted. Some 20 supporters were in the courtroom. "I still don't understand what I'm being charged for and who is charging me," he said. Kent Hovind, who often calls himself "Dr. Dino," has been sparring with the IRS for at least 17 years on his claims that he is employed by God, receives no income, has no expenses and owns no property.
Although seeing "church" and "guns" in the same sentence is disturbing in itself, I don't think we should jump to conclusions about the guns -- maybe Hovind just has a deer rifle and says that all of his property, including guns, belongs to his church -- but perhaps some of our legal beagle readers could see if any online legal documents have details.The indictment also says the Hovinds' made cash withdrawals from AmSouth Bank in a manner that evaded federal requirements for reporting cash transactions. The withdrawals were for $9,500 or $9,600, just below the $10,000 starting point for reporting cash transactions. Most of the withdrawals were days apart. For example, the indictment shows three withdrawals of $9,500 each on July 20, July 23 and July 26 in 2001. The indictment also charges Kent Hovind with impeding an IRS investigation. Among the ways he is accused of doing: * Filing a frivolous lawsuit against the agency demanding damages for criminal trespass. * Filing an injunction against an IRS special agent. * Filing false complaints against the IRS for false arrest, excessive use of force and theft. * Making threats against investigators and those cooperating with the investigation. Judge Davis released the Hovinds from custody pending their trial, which will be scheduled during their arraignment at 2 p.m. Monday. Over Kent Hovind's protests, the judge took away his passport and guns Hovind claimed belonged to his church.
55 Comments
steve s · 14 July 2006
Stephen Erickson · 14 July 2006
DaveScot has difficulty with abstract concepts like, oh, laws.
GuyeFaux · 14 July 2006
Stephen Erickson · 14 July 2006
P.S. I wonder if/when UD will chime in on Hovind's latest persecution, erp, prosecution.
Flint · 14 July 2006
What I always find somewhat disconcerting is how much tax evasion someone can actually get away with before the IRS finally takes action. Almost as though it's OK to evade even an enormous tax burden *unless* you are wanted for some other crime, or unless you flaunt your evasion publicly, bragging about it in books, websites, speeches, etc. Hovind's bogus claim that he is a church, so his personal income is tax-free (and not his; it belongs to God and Hovind only gets to spend it), seems to have served him well (i.e. taxless) for his entire adult life.
This is surely just another episode in the running battle between Hovind (who hasn't paid any taxes in at least 17 years) and the IRS (which hasn't managed to collect any), and I predict that the IRS will someday within the next few years find Hovind guilty of these counts, fine him something nowhere near close to what he actually owes, and Hovind will refuse to pay and appeal, making sure no funds can be traced. While the appeals wander around the interminable judicial Foggy Bottom, Hovind will continue publishing, speaking, and collecting donations which will promptly vanish into the laundry while Hovind continues to live, uh, in notable comfort. Probably as long as he lives.
Nor do I think Dinosaur Adventure Land is entirely history. It will get renamed, relocated, reburied in accounting shells inside shells. I'm just too cynical to think Hovind is too poor to buy the justice he desires, despite his claims of being penniless. Hovind is a famous Man of God, and the IRS will treat this case very gingerly.
frank schmidt · 14 July 2006
Hovind's "defense" vis DScot is rather like the ploy of being ordained in the Universal Life Church, the better to avoid drug laws.
Coin · 14 July 2006
Chiefley · 14 July 2006
No, the problem here, as Dave Scott sees it, is that the courts don't recognize the possibility of supernatural intervention.
You see, science is just the beginning. Next comes the notion of the Intelligent Intervener in criminal matters. You laugh, but that is what the wedge strategy document implies.
Dale · 14 July 2006
Arden Chatfield · 14 July 2006
k.e. · 14 July 2006
Chiefly has alluded to Hovind's defense already.
The guy will have no problems, his whole case is completely water tight, he is employed by g@d.
All he has to do is call HIM as a witness and get HIM to clear this whole stupid mess up.
I see it now.
IRS attorney: Would you state for the record your full name.
GOD: Mr God.
IRS: And your address Mr God ?
GOD: Currently?... no fixed abode Sir.
IRS: Well how about some proof of identity, say an old phone bill with your name on it.
GOD: Ah well, you see Sir, I never had a phone.
IRS: OK then, how about a birth certificate?
GOD: No can do there, Sir.
IRS: So no proof you are a citizen of the USA?
GOD: Nope.
IRS: Your Honor I move that the witness be dismissed.
His/Her Honor: The witness is dismissed.
Jason · 14 July 2006
I don't know the whole story, but the IRS is a lame lame lame agency, and I can see myself hating them and fighting them too. I wouldn't do it like Hovind, saying that I'm and employee of God (damn, that's dumb). But I'd fight them just the same (if I had any bleeding money.)
Coin · 14 July 2006
Shewhomustnotbenamed · 14 July 2006
Ya know, the IRS is giving me a whole bunch of crap because they misplaced some of the paperwork they acknowledge I sent them. Go figure.
Which reminds me, have to fax this stuff to them, again.
Paul Curtin · 14 July 2006
Now I work on the defense side of things so I can assure you that God would NEVER answer a subpoena to be a witness for Rev. H. Can you imagine how many outstanding warrants that punk has out for him on the basis of his followers' books alone? Not to mention more modern stuff that he's going to have to answer for.
No sir, the only way they'll ever get old god on the stand is if he takes the form of a black man behind the wheel of a nice car in ahywhere USA, and he'll get Gitmo'd so fast we'll never hear about it.
Albion · 14 July 2006
He doesn't recognise the authority of the United States? So who issued his passport? I didn't know God was in the business of issuing US passports.
Seems he recognises the authority of the United States when it suits him. If he wants to go on lecture tours abroad, he recognises the authority of the US government by applying for a passport. But when it comes to paying taxes, all of a sudden things are different.
Mike · 14 July 2006
"IRS attorney: Would you state for the record your full name."
GOD: Mr Damnit. God Damnit. Middle initial F.
Thanks to Martin Mull.
Joe McFaul · 14 July 2006
"The withdrawals were for $9,500 or $9,600, just below the $10,000 starting point for reporting cash transactions."
"I still don't understand what I'm being charged for and who is charging me," he said.
Dr. Dino, You're charged with smurfing. How ironic.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smurfing_(crime)
Alann · 14 July 2006
There are probable a number of real legal loop-holes that would allow him to mask his personal assets under the guise of a tax-exempt church which he runs; however there are definitely limits and he has definitely crossed them:
Tax exempt status does not apply to the employees of a tax exempt organization. This appears to be primarily where the half a million dollar charge comes from.
Tax exempt status does not automatically apply to all property or business run by such an organization. "Dinosaur Adventure Land" is not tax exempt even if his church is.
Oh and according to at least one source I read he refused to get construction permits because that went against his "deeply held religious beliefs".
Here is a guy who tried to declare bankruptcy while there was a couple hundred thousand in the bank.
I would think the more religious you are the more you would be offended by someone trying to misuse the exemptions granted religion so badly.
Alann · 14 July 2006
You'll never manage to subpoena God, he's in hiding over that creation scandal. When last reached for comment he said:
"I didn't do. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything." - God
Whatever · 14 July 2006
By not properly tracking or making Social Security payments, he's messing around with his employees' retirement benefits.
"I still don't understand what I'm being charged for and who is charging me," he [Hovind] said.
Neck-deep in denial until the bitter end...
Flint · 14 July 2006
Steve Harrynuk · 14 July 2006
A general Hovind question: Does anyone know about the validity of his claim to have taught high school science? None of Hovind's academic credentials are from accredited schools (except his high school diploma, if he has one). I don't know about Florida, but here in Canada you need at least a bachelor's degree to teach at a public school. So I can't see how a school board would hire him, unless he worked at a private school or one that hires outside the teacher's union.
Gary Hurd · 14 July 2006
Hovind taught at a few Christian schools, but never for very long at any one school. He never taught at a public school.
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 14 July 2006
It should be perhaps pointed out that Hovind and his, uh "tax lawyer" are both longtime "tax protestors", a segment of the lunatic "patriot militia" movement that, among other things, was Timothy McVeigh's entry into the lunatic right-wing.
Hovind has loony militia connections right up to his eyebrows, and many of his idiotic conspiracy theories -- "the government blew up the Oklahoma City building so it could blame the militias", "the government is spying on us through our TV sets" -- are lifted, word ofr word, from the militia kooks.
Of course, LOTS of fundie fruitcakes (such as Pat Robertson and Jack van Impe) were making nice-nice with the militia nutters, right up till the Oklahoma City bombing and all those resulting Congressional hearings. Then, for some odd reason, they all of a sudden fell all over themsleves to distance themselves from their former militia friends.
Trace Hovind's various connections to their source, and you will get a very good thumbnail education in the far-right lunatic fringe, and where the fundies fit into it.
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 14 July 2006
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 14 July 2006
Martin · 14 July 2006
I never cease to be amazed at the brazen audacity with which fundies adhere to the "I'm a Christian, the rules don't apply to me" attitude. Perhaps the pathetic way they follow up with their second favorite whine: "They're persecuting me, and all I did was break the law! But I'm not like other people!"
I think the word for all of this is schadenfreude. It's just been all too awesome.
Barbara Rainey · 14 July 2006
The church of "Dr. Dino" resides in a compound where weapons are stocked? Sounds more like a cult than a church! In fact, it's more along the line of the People's Temple and the Branch Davidians! And no doubt Hovind is their Rev. Jim Jones and David Koresh!
Barbara R.
Coin · 14 July 2006
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 14 July 2006
Henry J · 14 July 2006
Re "If you happen to believe the Bible, send your children to a Christian school, rebel, hoard guns, ammunition or food, or are nervous about the government, you are considered to be a dangerous cult in their minds..."
Offhand, the "rebel, hoard guns, ammunition" part does strike me as indicating that somebody is dangerous. Not the first two points or the food. As for nervous about the government - right now that may be large fraction of the country.
Henry
Stephen Erickson · 15 July 2006
OT: Does anyone else find it a bit comical that a biology professor at a backwoods Minnesota college claims you can't believe in God and be a scientist, too?
steve s · 15 July 2006
Not sure I've ever seen a biology professor say "you can't believe in God and be a scientist, too."
But if you have a reference, I'll be glad to take a look.
Elf Eye · 15 July 2006
Hovind writes, "Did you know that Adolf Hitler's gun control law, WORD FOR WORD, almost made it through our senate and house of representatives a couple of years ago?"
That's a pretty neat trick, considering that any German gun control law would be written in, well, German, and any 'word for word' version in English would be pretty incomprehensible.
Corkscrew · 15 July 2006
KCrist · 15 July 2006
Since on, I think, two occasions Kent has submitted documents to the court claiming to not be a citizen of the US or the state of FL, why does he need a US passport, which the judge confiscated? It will be interesting to see if he cancels his travel schedule or whether his son, Eric, picks up the slack. Based upon the brief statement in the Pensacola News, he was apparently pretty upset with the judge for preventing him from going to South Africa by taking his passport.
On the issue of the building permits and code violations, Kent had non-government inspectors look at his illegal buildings and apparently they may be up to code, but Kent believes any government mandated permits, codes and inspectors are a form of taxation and government intrusion into churches. He would not let the official inspectors on "church" property or pay the $50 permit fee. Kent apparently does not believe in paying any taxes despite enjoying the relatively peaceful and prosperous society they help maintain. He claims to have spent over $400,000 defending himself over the matter of the building permits. That is suspiciously close to the amount the court indictment says he and his wife snuck out of the bank. Connection, fable or coincidence?
In Dover, PA, I heard him tell the audience that they should have the right to specify what their children are taught since they pay taxes. That always seemed like a bit of the hypocrite talking, but maybe "men of God" (at least like him) should be allowed a lower standard of behavior than us regular sinners, because their work is so important.
Mephisto · 15 July 2006
guthrie · 15 July 2006
Tangentially related, but I recall hearing that after WW2 they worked out that you needed something like a ratio of one occupying soldier to 20 civilians to keep a country quiet under occupation. So that means Hovinds 300,000 needs to be more like 13 million.
Mephisto · 15 July 2006
Mephisto · 15 July 2006
It's a great time to see the interview where Ali G "interviewed" Kent Hovind again. Hovind was completely unaware that Ali G was mocking him and took it all very seriously.
Kent Hovind Interviewed by Ali G
Ali G, for those who don't know, is a British Jew called Sacha Baron Cohen who is quite highly educated but parodies the street culture of certain British Afro-Carribean youths (or rather, white British middle-class stereotypes of them).
This interview is truly hilarious.
lanewilcox · 15 July 2006
steve s · 15 July 2006
Daniel Morgan · 15 July 2006
Matt pointed out a while back that because Kent had disclaimed his citizenship, then his possession of firearms is a felony. I wonder if they'll add this charge on?
Anybody know anybody at the ATF?
steve s · 15 July 2006
I feel sorry for Jo Hovind, though. In my extensive experience with poor southern kooks, it's usually the husband who gets obsessed with some idiotic belief system (focusing on the UN / Bilderbergs / Satanic Cults / etc) and slowly, gradually, the wife follows where the husband leads.
I'm not saying Jo started out as Miss Rationalist, but she probably wouldn't be facing tax charges and such without Kent.
Gordon · 16 July 2006
wamba · 16 July 2006
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 16 July 2006
Troff · 16 July 2006
Hey, wait a minute.
If he's been withdrawing his money in a suspicious or illegal fashion, if he has unregistered weaponry and if he's made statements attempting to alter the purpose of the United States government...
... why is he not up on terrorism charges instead of just tax avoidance?
And he is, clearly, completely batnuts. If he claims "believing in the Bible" is enough in the U.S. to be labelled a "dangerous cult"...
Raging Bee · 17 July 2006
You see, science is just the beginning. Next comes the notion of the Intelligent Intervener in criminal matters. You laugh, but that is what the wedge strategy document implies.
I'm betting the next step is witchcraft trials. Every time a fundie wingnut chokes on something (or gets caught "praying" with/on an underage student or intern), someone will be accused of using Satanic powers to make it happen.
Moses · 17 July 2006
Moses · 17 July 2006
Popper's ghost · 17 July 2006
Popper's ghost · 17 July 2006
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 18 July 2006