No comment from me necessary, except I guess that I wasn't completely wrong. [Updated: I have moved the copious off-topic comments to the Bathroom Wall. Please talk about Titan, stealth figher anti-radar technology, and other related topics that are actually interesting.]Lakes on Titan July 24, 2006 Full-Res: PIA08630 The Cassini spacecraft, using its radar system, has discovered very strong evidence for hydrocarbon lakes on Titan. Dark patches, which resemble terrestrial lakes, seem to be sprinkled all over the high latitudes surrounding Titan's north pole. Scientists have speculated that liquid methane or ethane might form lakes on Titan, particularly near the somewhat colder polar regions. In the images, a variety of dark patches, some with channels leading in or out of them, appear. The channels have a shape that strongly implies they were carved by liquid. Some of the dark patches and connecting channels are completely black, that is, they reflect back essentially no radar signal, and hence must be extremely smooth. In some cases rims can be seen around the dark patches, suggesting deposits that might form as liquid evaporates. The abundant methane in Titan's atmosphere is stable as a liquid under Titan conditions, as is its abundant chemical product, ethane, but liquid water is not. For all these reasons, scientists interpret the dark areas as lakes of liquid methane or ethane, making Titan the only body in the solar system besides Earth known to possess lakes. Because such lakes may wax and wane over time, and winds may alter the roughness of their surfaces. Repeat coverage of these areas should test whether indeed these are bodies of liquid.
50 Comments
Andrew McClure · 25 July 2006
That is awesome.
buddha · 25 July 2006
Anonymous_Coward · 25 July 2006
Peter Henderson · 25 July 2006
Some YEC organisation somewhere (probably AIG) will have an article which will claim "Lakes on Titan confirm creation (or a young solar system) !" or something similar !
I think astronomers did predict this though. Is there any evidence of waves ? This was a discussion topic in a recent Open University astronomy course that I did recently.
Andrew McClure · 25 July 2006
Anonymous_Coward · 25 July 2006
deadman_932 · 25 July 2006
MMMmmm...Slushies.
Keith Douglas · 25 July 2006
That might be one greasy slushie ...
Laser · 25 July 2006
steve s · 25 July 2006
Geoff Offermann · 25 July 2006
Laser: Can someone explain to me why this is so? Very smooth surfaces reflect visible wavelengths well. Why is that not the case with radio waves?
I think if they are black images this means that they reflect very well. This is counterintuitive, but it is the case as far as I can tell.
Anonymous_Coward · 25 July 2006
Anonymous_Coward · 25 July 2006
For example:
If you are in a darkened room with a mirror and you shine a light beam onto it at an angle, you would probably not see the mirror.
If instead the mirror was replaced by a piece of paper, you would probably be able to see the piece of paper because some of the roughness would reflect part of the beam back to you.
I'm guessing it would be much more exact in the real case since the lake seems to be large and would have a slight curvature to it.
But I'm just taking a wild wild guess.
steve s · 25 July 2006
Specular vs Diffuse Reflection
Anonymous_Coward · 25 July 2006
Okay, I tried to read it, but I think I have a reading problem.
How close was I?
steve s · 25 July 2006
tacitus · 25 July 2006
You can tell the lakes are evidence of design by the way the shorelines are designed to maximize the amount of water--er, methane--front property.
King Aardvark · 25 July 2006
WWJD = What Would Jesus Drink?
K.E. · 25 July 2006
OK on the reflection thingy radio waves reflect off a flat conductive surface, such as sea water, almost perfectly.
However depending on the wavelength and the angle of incidence the reflection can be practically nil.
Allied bombers during WW2 used the lakes around Berlin with X-band H2S Radar (10Ghz /3cm ) as a guide to identify targets. The resolution of a 3cm wavelength radar is + or - a couple of wavelenths and a flat surface is plainly visable on a display weather it reflects or not, compared to rough surroundings.
The Germans when they discovered this quickly covered the lakes with antennas configured to reflect the signals (I'm guessing at different heights) so the lakes could not be used to guide the bombers.
GuyeFaux · 25 July 2006
Glen Davidson · 25 July 2006
Nick Matzke · 25 July 2006
Regarding the lakes being black in the images, several people of figured it out, but here is a summary of why it works this way:
* The only "light source" for these images is the radar beams (= radio waves) that the Cassini satellite is shooting out.
* The satellite shoots out some radio waves, and then waits for the radar signal to bounce back. This signal is called backscatter.
* Backscatter depends on the chemical structure of materials but more importantly on the "roughness" of the surface. Rough surfaces will always have some surfaces directly perpendicular to the radio beam, which will bounce the signal directly back to the satellite
* Because the radar is being shot down to the surface at an angle, radar aimed at very smooth surfaces will "bounce away" from the satellite rather than bounce back to the satellite. Therefore low return is recorded for smooth surfaces, and when this is turned into image pixels smooth surfaces appear black.
(smooth surfaces are known as "specular", i.e. mirrorlike)
In conclusion, these images mean that there are large specular reflectors down on Titan with lakelike shapes. It also may mean that there is not enough wind to produce much in the way of waves or "chop" (which radar can also detect under some circumstances). Placid hydrocarbon lakes evidently.
Glen Davidson · 25 July 2006
As much evidence exists for the demise of evolution as exists for rational design in biology.
I like the struggle to stretch out the "inevitable collapse" of evolutionary theory. Apparently evolution happens rather more rapidly than evolutionary theory collapses.
Btw, "inevitable demise", you apparently aren't very bright, since you seem unable to differentiate between a post about evolution and one about Titan and its lakes.
Glen D
http://tinyurl.com/b8ykm
Peter Henderson · 25 July 2006
Although this blog mostly deals with the biological arguments by creationists latest guise ID, YEC's also deny things like stellar evolution. I often wonder how creationists like Dr Jason Lisle interpret Hertzsprung - Russell diagrams for example. If Dr. Lisle's version of astronomy were to be adopted in American Universities (as AIG hopes will happen one day) would these become obsolete, since according to them stars don't evolve. I've often wondered about that.
Peter Henderson · 25 July 2006
All very good folks, but what has all this got to do with lakes on Titan ?
end · 25 July 2006
And your presuppositions of antisupernaturalism are less than impressive.
Bruce Thompson GQ · 25 July 2006
Peter Henderson · 25 July 2006
Re #114776. More interesting photos Bruce. As I was saying, the OU course speculated about the existence of waves on these areas of liquid methane/ethane. As far as I can remember, there was also a prediction of Methane rain/snow. Can anyone confirm what type of weather (if any) is present on Titan ?
Coin · 25 July 2006
This thread confuses me. Truly, it appears we have angered the Jupiterians.
Peter Henderson · 25 July 2006
Re#114772: Just because we don't know how life arose from no-life now doesn't mean we'll never know. At the moment it is beyond our understanding. However, there were many things that were meta-physics several hundred years ago which can now be explained by science.
I would hazard a guess that if we were able to physically able to explore every planetary body in the solar system, we would come across microbial life in quite a few of them, even in the most harshest of environments.
http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/earth/Life/archaea.html
Nick (Matzke) · 25 July 2006
Update: I have moved the copious off-topic comments to the Bathroom Wall. Please talk about Titan, stealth figher anti-radar technology, and other related topics that are actually interesting.
jeannot · 25 July 2006
We've got a winner here. He even sounds more retarded than AFDave!
Just out of curiosity: how old is the Earth, Mr fanatic?
fnxtr · 25 July 2006
Thanks, Nick, for scooping up the poop before I even got here. Makes for a much more pleasant/interesting read.
Bruce Thompson GQ · 25 July 2006
Robert C · 25 July 2006
Anyone who is interested in a detailed summary of Titan's chemistry can read this paper from the European Space Agency:
http://www.rssd.esa.int/SB/HUYGENS/docs/SP1177/raulin.pdf
The author suggests that UV light could create interesting products in the atmosphere, which would exist in aerosols, or precipitate. Liquid oceans might be very important for protecting the precipitated complex organics from UV photolysis, keeping them soluble, and allowing more chemistry. The accumulation of interesting organics in a ethane/methane sea seems pretty cool....
whheydt · 25 July 2006
Ever since the possibility of liquids on the surface of Titan was raised, I've thought that any serious Titan lander should include a fishing pole. Who knows what might 'bite'....
Torbjörn Larsson · 25 July 2006
"such lakes may wax"
Such witticisms make me melt.
"Can anyone confirm what type of weather (if any) is present on Titan ?"
It seems to be cold with some liquid methane clouds and perhaps rain. If the sun wasn't so weak, I would like to buy a beach property along one of those calm lakes. Googling I found these descriptions for example:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/titan_weather_001020-1.html
http://www.astrobio.net/news/article1759.html
http://uanews.org/cgi-bin/WebObjects/UANews.woa/1/wa/MainStoryDetails?ArticleID=11870
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Cassini-Huygens/SEMAXTMZCIE_0.html
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 25 July 2006
How long before Exxon sends a probe to pump the lakes into a spaceship and carry it back here?
;>
fnxtr · 25 July 2006
Lenny: ... or just use it for fuel to go even farther.
Further?
Use it for further explorations.
Farther.
Never mind. It would be cool.
'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank · 25 July 2006
Tice with a J · 25 July 2006
LAKES ON A MOON!
I can't believe I'm the first person to make a "Snakes on a Plane" joke.
steve s · 25 July 2006
We got Mothaf%cking Lakes on the Mothaf%cking Moon
Anonymous_Coward · 26 July 2006
Michael Suttkus, II · 26 July 2006
Unk · 26 July 2006
Can you see Rumfoord's house?
wamba · 26 July 2006
It's cooler by the lake.
Bruce Thompson GQ · 26 July 2006
Longer chain hydrocarbons are present in Titan's atmosphere but oxygen exists only as a minor constituent limiting hopes of remedying the butter shortage.
Delta Pi Gamma (Scientia et Fermentum)
Torbjörn Larsson · 26 July 2006
The weather report now also includes ice crystals, rainfall and fierce polar storms ( http://www.newscientistspace.com/article.ns?id=mg19125623.600&feedId=online-news_rss20 ).
GuyeFaux · 27 July 2006
I wonder if Rachel Scwartz a.k.a. John Griffin a.k.a. all the other theorusts are trying to populate PT with this garbage so that in a year they can refer back to it and say "Look at all the controversy!"
I guess the hope is that the debunking/exposing will be lost over time.
fnxtr · 31 July 2006