KU Difficult Dialogs Video Series online
The University of Kansas Hall Center for the Humanities has put online the videos from this fall's "Difficult Dialogs" series. Included are talks by Ken Miller, Judge Jones, Richard Dawkins, Eugenie Scott, and Michael Behe. We had some previous discussion of the Behe talk here. (Apparently Behe was the ID guy who "discovered" that lawyers file a lot of paper with the court before, during, and after a trial, including Proposed Findings of Fact, which of course would be obvious if one had looked at the Kitzmiller documents archive that NCSE has maintained since the trial began.)
13 Comments
Gerry L · 21 December 2006
I've watched the Miller and Jones videos so far, but I've been having problems with the Dawkins video. It gets so far then just stops. And it's not just a pause. I have to restart and drag the marker to a spot past where it previously stopped, missing only a few seconds if I'm lucky. (More if not.) In two sessions over the past week I've gotten through about half.
Is anyone else having this problem? I'm on standard (not FIOS) DSL broadband.
molecanthro · 21 December 2006
hmm...i just watched the behe video (from Dec. 7th). he decided to start out by rambling on about how Judge Jones copied the findings of fact!
basically, he made it seem like the Judge stole the whole opinion.."cut and paste, drag and drop." he was also lovely enough to say "but, it turns out there's serious reason to question whether the judge even understood the academic issues that were presented..."
bjm · 22 December 2006
I just watched Behe's talk and it was sad to hear a trained scientist who is in denial about reality and the science that is going on around him. I particularly enjoyed the concluding statement to his brief explanation of IC and the flagellum and his proposal that a non-ID explanation is "..an enormously daunting task which nobody has tried to explain in relevant detail."
Interestingly though, in the Q&A session he gets asked about why he doesn't acknowledge counter claims against IC systems. His response is to now say that suggestions about developmental pathways for arranging parts into a complex system are NOT counter arguments against IC as IC is all about how the system FUNCTIONS (and I thought it was about how it came to be?). That makes nearly everything IC - if I take the battery out of my laptop it stops working so my laptop must be an example of IC! QED! (Note to his mechanic; if he ever calls you to say his car won't start and you discover the battery is flat try explaining it in terms of IC and suggest he needs to buy a new car?)
Popper's ghost · 22 December 2006
frank schmidt · 22 December 2006
I also listened to the Behe talk. While most of it could be summarized "I'm sooo misunderstood," the most telling point for me was his misunderstanding of testing in science. He said that the common definition of scientific utility is whether an observation leads to new hypotheses but then said, that one could observe a new planet going around the Sun but that this observation would not likely lead to useful new hypotheses. I suspect that planetary scientists would disagree - the argument from personal ignorance extends far in Dr. Behe's world.
One doesn't need to be a philosopher of science to do science, but before he spouts off about other people's expertise, he ought to do the homework. It's all rather like reading a sex manual written by the Pope.
One disappointment was not seeing his slides on the video.
Steviepinhead · 3 January 2007
I've learned a lot on this site.
But I'm betting all that learning pales compared with the things the last several commenters on this thread could share.
One shudders to think.
Although I absolutely refuse to place my ymzj anywhere near "her" bjaw, thank you very much.
Henry J · 6 January 2007
Good grief.
Steviepinhead · 6 January 2007
Heh heh.
Yep, Henry. Not only are we not getting our "message" across to our (presumably) overly-busy thread managers, but "we" (PTers in general) seem to be projecting a very different image of our, um, "interests" to the internet at large than the one "we" intended...
I'm tempted to blame it all on Pops and Katrina for heating up the threads over the last few weeks, but that's probably neither accurate nor, ahem, charitable.
Sten55281 · 10 January 2007
I feel like an empty room, but eh. Nothing seems worth doing. I haven't gotten much done today.
Katarina · 10 January 2007
Sten18089 · 12 January 2007
I feel like an empty room, but eh. Nothing seems worth doing. I haven't gotten much done today.
Andreas Peter · 14 January 2007
We sell a wide range of products. Nokia , Motorola , Samsung , Sony Ericsson , Nextel , Siemens s. Digital Cameras , Nikon Camera, Canon Camera. Games , Xbox 360 , NIntendo , Play Station 2 , Sony PSP's , GBA. PDA.Pocket pc Tomtom Go 700 , Tomtom Go 600 and Tomtom Go 500 Ipods Nano , Ipod Mini , Ipod Shuffle. Laptops/Notebook. If you are indeed interested and ready to order pls contact us on the information below. Email: darell_com@yahoo.com .
NOKIA LIST:
NOKIA N70-- $140
NOKIA N71--$160
NOKIA N72--$170
NOKIA N80-- $170
NOKIA N90-- $180
NOKIA N91-- $190
NOKIA N92-- $200
NOKIA N93-- $300
NOKIA N95-- $350
NOKIA 8800-- $150
NOKIA 8801--$160
NOKIA 9300--$140
NOKIA 9500--$160
NEXTEL LIST:
NEXTEL i830 -- $120
NEXTEL i860 -- $130
NEXTEL i930 -- $110
NEXTEL i860 -- $100
NEXTEL 1930 -- $120
NEXTEL i870 -- $140
NEXTEL i450 -- $90
NEXTEL 1860 -- $110
APPLE IPOD NANO PRICE LIST:
Apple 2 GB iPod Nano--$50
Apple 4 GB iPod Nano--$60
Apple 30 GB iPod Video--$110
Apple 60 GB iPod Video--$150
Apple 80 GB IPod Video--$180
Apple 40 GB iPod photo--$40
Apple 60 GB iPod photo--$55
Apple 30 GB iPod Photo M9829LL/A--$50
Apple iPod nano Media Player 2GB--$100
Apple iPod nano Media Player 4GB--$150
Apple iPod nano Media Player 6GB--$200
Apple 60 GB iPod Photo M9830LL/A--$60
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Blue M9436LL/A--$45
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Pink M9435LL/A--$40
Apple 512 MB iPod Shuffle MP3 Player--$40
Apple 4 GB iPod Mini Silver M9160LL/A-$40
I-MATE LIST:
I-MATE SP5-- $150
I-MATE SP5m--$155
I-MATE SP4m--$120
I-MATE JAM-- $160
I-MATE PDA2--$190
I-MATE SP3i--$130
I-MATE SP3-- $135
I-MATE PDA2k-$168
I-MATE JAMin--$240
I-MATE JASJAR-$280
I-MATE K-JAM--$180
I-MATE Pocket PC--$140
I-MATE JAM Black--$150
I-MATE Smartflip--$140
I-MATE Smartphone2--$110
I-MATE Smartphone-- $115
PALM TREO'S LIST.
PALM TREO 700WX-- $230
PALM TREO 700X--- $220
PALM TREO 700P--- $210
PALM TREO 700---- $200
PALM TREO 650---- $170
PALM TREO 600---- $150
MOTOROLA LIST:
MOTOROLA V300--$100
MOTOROLA V400--$115
MOTOROLA L7--- $160
MOTOROLA L6-- $150
MOTOROLA V51-- $90
MOTOROLA V50-- $80
MOTOROLA V70-- $100
MOTOROLA V60-- $95
MOTOROLA V600--$120
MOTOROLA V3 RAZ-- $160
MOTOROLA MPX 300--$180
MOTOROLA MPX 220--$120
MOTOROLA MPX 300--$160
02 PHONES LIST:
O2 X2i--$120
02 X4-- $130
02 X3-- $120
02 x7-- $140
02 xDA Exec--$280
02 XDA Atom--$260
02 XDA NEO-- $265
02 XDA IIi-- $180
02 XDA IIs-- $185
02 XDA mini S-- $270
02 XDA II mini--$200
SAMSUNG LIST:
SAMSUNG S105--$50
SAMSUNG D800--$185
SAMSUNG D500--$160
SAMSUNG SGH D720-- $170
SAMSUNG SGH-T200-- $110
SAMSUNG SGH-D900-- $200
SAMSUNG SGH-T500-- $100
SAMSUNG SGH-S307-- $110
SAMSUNG SGH-N620-- $59
SAMSUNG SGH-A800-- $69
SAMSUNG SCH i830-- $220
SAMSUNG MM-1940 -- $190
SONY ERICSSON LIST:
SONY ERICSSON T600-- $100
SONY ERICSSON P800-- $180
SONY ERICSSON P900---$200
SONY ERICSSON P980i--$200
SONY ERICSSON P990-- $210
SONY ERICSSON W800i--$140
SONY ERICSSON W900i--$220
SONY ERICSSON S700i--$125
SIDEKICK PHONE LIST.
SIDEKICK III-- $150
SIDEKICK II -- $100
JUICY COUTURE SIDEKICK II-- $130
SIDEKICK II MISTER CARTOON--$130
PLASTATIONS VIDEO GAMES LIST:
GARMIN 396--$150
SONY PLAYSTATION 1 -- $120
SONY PLAYSTATION 2 -- $130
SONY PLAYSTATION 3 -- $170
SONY PSP VALUE PACK -- $95
XBOX GAMES LIST:
Xbox 360 Core System -- $163
Xbox 360 Prenium pack --$190
Xbox 360 Platinum Bundle Console -- $155
Intec G8600 Xbox 360 9.2 TFT Screen--$85 .
Nintendo Wii Console -- $160
QTEK SMARTPHONE LIST:
Qtek 8500--$130
Qtek S200--$180
Qtek 9000--$250
Qtek 8310--$200
Qtek 8300--$185
Qtek 9100--$270
Qtek 8100--$150
Qtek S110--$175
Qtek S100--$190
Qtek 9090--$200
Qtek 8020--$190
Qtek 8010--$140
Qtek 2020i-$220
Qtek 2020--$200
Qtek 1010--$140
Qtek S200--$200
We look forward to your Prompt Reply .......SERIOUS AND LEGIT BUYERS NEEDED.
Do contact us direct by Email: darell_com@yahoo.com .
Chris · 14 January 2007
I'm just a layman, but I think I understand that certain people misconstrue the 2nd law when they don't realize that without it there's nothing to fuel life. But, what about the whole? I mean, since the 2nd law also fuels stars, galaxies, etc., and if the universe as a whole is a closed system, then, isn't the universe as a whole gradually losing it's capacity to fuel (anything)?
If so, then wouldn't that mean that the universe could not have existed forever, because if it had it would have 'run out of gas' by now? And, would such considerations also apply to a 'multiverse' or, would it be said that such a thing would have laws that don't require fuel to get work done, or, that fuel is somehow (like a perpetual motion machine?) eternally replenished, or...?
If the answer to this is something like the mulitiverse got fuel from prior multiverses, etc., then does the fallacy of infinite regress come into play here? I mean, is it proper to ask where everything came from in the first place?