Well it looks like one of the minds behind Expelled has joined the Banned in our forum. Go join the discussion and ask him all the questions that the press were not allowed to.
Hey here is Kevin Miller's blog I guess he is one of the writers for Expelled? I invited him to drop by and chat with us I told him most everyone here is an atheist, scientist or evil doer in general. If he shows up please don't let me down. Chris!Let the party begin.
11 Comments
Doc Bill · 26 February 2008
Disappointing, actually.
Kevin couldn't answer the simplest question: from what was Sternberg expelled?
Kevin squealed and ran like a pig.
Ichthyic · 27 February 2008
Kevin squealed and ran like a pig.
oops, he better watch out for Ken Ham...
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/ken_hams_new_book.php
Torbach · 27 February 2008
As always cDesign proponentsists argue that a stonecutter global community of random educated individuals for the last ~300 years have spawned a campaign blockade against the freedom of 5000 year old faiths.
Darwin's law of evolution never needed public relations, a political strategy, lawyers or publicists to get its ideas established. Evolution survived a long process of fact checking and scrutiny. It is as solid as world history and, like history, critical for humanity to practice and preserve.
To challenge science at its root (as kev suggested in one post) is to simply destroy what works. Humanity established and refined rule and law of math. Until ID proves it is science it stays where it currently belongs, philosophy.
This is a political issue on their part and i think we start make it one. People want to reestablish tax dollars to alternatives to proper medicine. Then we might as well require patients accept a private contract to protect the funds that establish medical expertise.
a contract that is used as power of attorney in matters regarding biology and its institution in society and education.
Let ID believers request Design to administer their child's vaccines.
JGB · 27 February 2008
While there was definitely no attempt to grapple with many of the key questions, That thread was not exactly the most useful. The cutting questions tended to be conflated with immature digressions on Mouth Breathers. What purpose does that sort of name calling serve? I don't seem to recall anybody calling me a Neanderthall during my Oral examination even when I was unsure of or struggled with questions. It's one thing to hound known trolls who hit and run post. It is quite another to hound another even though by association he has a high probability of being a troll. If he is give him enough rope to hang himself in a public forum, but to be rude straight off as some where in the thread is unbecoming.
raven · 27 February 2008
Reed A. Cartwright · 28 February 2008
Checking Cache control...
Reed A. Cartwright · 28 February 2008
Reed A. Cartwright · 1 March 2008
ping
Reed A. Cartwright · 1 March 2008
bump
Reed A. Cartwright · 1 March 2008
This is a spelling test
Reed A. Cartwright · 1 March 2008
spelling test