What could have been Murphy's 'crime'? She published a scathing review of Johnson's "Darwin on Trial" titled Phillip Johnson on Trial: A Critique of His Critique of Darwin in Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith, 1993, vol 45, no 1 pp 26-36.Nancey Murphy, a religious scholar at Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, Calif., said she faced a campaign to get her fired because she expressed the view that intelligent design was not only poor theology, but "so stupid, I don't want to give them my time." Murphy, who believes in evolution, said she had to fight to keep her job after one of the founding members of the intelligent design movement, legal theorist Phillip Johnson, called a trustee at the seminary and tried to get her fired. "His tactic has always been to fight dirty when anyone attacks his ideas," she said. "For a long time afterward, I would tell reporters I don't want to comment, and I don't want you to say I don't want to comment. I'm tired of being careful." Johnson denied he had tried to get Murphy fired. He said that he had spoken with a former trustee of the seminary who was himself upset with Murphy but that he was not responsible for any action taken against her. "It's the Darwinists who hold the power in academia and who threaten the professional status and livelihoods of anyone who disagrees," Johnson said. "They feel to teach anything but their orthodoxy is an act of professional treason."
The Washington Post also describes the story of Caroline CrockerPhillip Johnson's recent book, Darwin on Trial, claims to show that the reasoning presented in favor of evolutionary biology is defective. Such a book, being one of so many, would excite little attention were it not for the fact that the author is an expert in legal reasoning, and has contributed his particular skills to the debate. However, the canons of scientific argument are quite different from those of the courtroom, and it can be shown that Johnson's critique of Darwinian thought falls far short of the mark in that it does not fully appreciate the special requirements of scientific argumentation.
— Nancey Murphy
Screenshots of Coral Ridge videoGMU spokesman Daniel Walsch denied that the school had fired Crocker. She was a part-time faculty member, he said, and was let go at the end of her contract period for reasons unrelated to her views on intelligent design. "We wholeheartedly support academic freedom," he said. But teachers also have a responsibility to stick to subjects they were hired to teach, he added, and intelligent design belonged in a religion class, not biology. Does academic freedom "literally give you the right to talk about anything, whether it has anything to do with the subject matter or not? The answer is no."
64 Comments
tacitus · 30 March 2008
One minor correction -- Crocker's slides weren't made avaiable per se, the images over at TinyFrog are stills from the "Coral Ridge Hour" show you mention. So, ironically, she must have supplied them to the show as examples of how innocuous her materials were and how good a teacher she was.
Obviously she flunked on both counts.
Torbjörn Larsson, OM · 30 March 2008
The main links in the post uses nonstandard linking (they don't lead to the full post but the Expelled Expose website), which is a time waster.
Otherwise, this was timely info. Keep at'em!
John Kwok · 30 March 2008
PZ, 'tis an excellent post. I've quoted it in brief reminders elsewhere, especially over at Amazon.com, merely to demonstrate yet another example of the Disco Tute's Fascist behavior.
raven · 30 March 2008
Crocker is astonishingly incompetent.
Her slide Presumed Transitional Fossils are just creo lies strung together.
My comments in bold.
Birds in same layer.
This is a lie. What are in the same layer are Pterodactyls and dinosaurs.
Is a bird, not a reptobird.
Another lie. Archaeaopteryx has a toothed jaw, no beak, claws on its wings, and a long dinosaurian tail and skeleton.
only one complete fossil
Lie. There are 10 fossils collected over a 150 year period.
Questioned as a fraud.
Hoyle made some allegations. They were investigated and proved false.
All this is on wikipedia which she apparently never heard of. If she had presented this as a freshman in biology, she would have gotten an F.
Her other slides are equally lame, just channeling AIG class lies and not worth the time to parse.
She got off lucky, she should have been fired but merely failed to get her contract renewed.
Troy Britain · 30 March 2008
raven · 30 March 2008
raven · 30 March 2008
SWT · 30 March 2008
Ichthyic · 30 March 2008
Murphy, who believes in evolution, said she had to fight to keep her job after one of the founding members of the intelligent design movement, legal theorist Phillip Johnson, called a trustee at the seminary and tried to get her fired.
having seen Johnson pop in here on rare occasions, I wonder if he will deign to defend himself on this?
...and I always thought Phil was such a nice guy.
Ichthyic · 30 March 2008
I’m going to send it to the NSCE website
excellent; I'm quite sure there are many more data points to add, especially if you start considering the number of high school teachers that simply bypassed teaching evolution for fear of angry parents.
In fact, I'd bet that it would be a nice part of the NSCE's efforts on the expelled/exposed website they are putting together.
Ichthyic · 30 March 2008
http://www.expelledexposed.com/
Ichthyic · 30 March 2008
yeah, I did that intentionally.
more links the better.
Jedidiah Palosaari · 30 March 2008
Wow. This is my former school, and I took a class from Murphy. Having taken a number of classes there, I'm just shocked that any of the administration or facutly would have an issue with evolution. I would never have suspected it. From some students, yes- but not from administration and faculty. The general impression given in classes (though the topic rarely comes up, of course) is quite the opposite.
Jedidiah Palosaari · 30 March 2008
I don't get why the author of the Washington Post article was using the term "Darwinism". Is he a closet ID supporter?
Troy Britain · 30 March 2008
I found another similar example in Howard Van Till. See: More irony from the ID creationist crowd
Frank J · 30 March 2008
FL · 30 March 2008
Ichthyic · 30 March 2008
your quotemining is even more disconnected and disingenuous than usual, FL.
kudos.
FL · 30 March 2008
Andrew L · 30 March 2008
PvM · 30 March 2008
FL ignores conveniently the context in which PZ made these statements. He believes that as scientists we should not hold back when we are confronted with scientific ignorance such as Intelligent Design. This has nothing to do with the livelihoods of scientists, but all with good science.
FL · 30 March 2008
Mike Gene is a scientist too, don't forget.
You disagree with his statement?
raven · 30 March 2008
Reginald · 30 March 2008
harold · 30 March 2008
wad of id · 30 March 2008
Mike Gene thinks that ID is not science and that it should not be taught in classrooms. Your point, FL?
FL · 30 March 2008
Reginald · 30 March 2008
Dale Husband · 30 March 2008
FL takes everything said by PZ Myers literally because that is how he reads the Bible. Both approaches are equally stupid.
Stanton · 30 March 2008
GODDESIGNERDIDIT" is much easier for the poor little students to absorb into their heads than boring old science or biology textbooks. That, and Intelligent Design "theory" is allegedly science, even though no Intelligent Design proponents, not at the Discovery Institute, and especially not FL, himself, have any motivation to demonstrate that it's science in the first place.Stanton · 30 March 2008
SWT · 30 March 2008
FL,
Are you seriously arguing that Mr. Boa's drinking is the cause of Mr. York's actions?
Dale Husband · 30 March 2008
Dale Husband · 30 March 2008
DavidK · 30 March 2008
FL's true identity?
Luskin?
Johnson?
Demski?
Meyers?
(and the other DI/IDists)
I wager it's one of them.
PvM · 30 March 2008
Ichthyic · 30 March 2008
“I want to be clear that I personally find Professor Mirecki’s e-mail comments repugnant and vile. They do not represent my views nor the views of this university. People of all faiths are valued at KU, and campus ministries are an important part of life at the university. “Dr. Mirecki has made the right decision by his withdrawal from the course. He has a right to free speech but he has to realize the revelation of his past e-mails has tainted the environment for his course. He insulted both our students and the university’s public, and he misrepresented beliefs of KU’s faculty and staff.”
more quote mining by our local liar for Jesus.
do you even remember what the context was anymore?
moron.
MPW · 30 March 2008
I don't think anyone has pointed out yet that FL's opening comment on this thread is a non-sequitur as regards the original post and Ichthyic's comment that FL was supposedly responding to. PvM's post discussed Murphy's critique of Johnson's book, and the claim that Johnson had subsequently intervened to try to get Murphy fired. Ichthyic speculated on Johnson's possibly turning up here to defend himself. Then FL popped up to throw out an only tangentially related quote from Johnson and proceed to talk as if that was what Ichthyic was saying Johnson has to defend.
In other words, trolling, with the classic elements: Distraction, misdirection, thread derailment, etc.
The quote from PZ which FL presents as proving Johnson's contention is also a bit of a non-sequitur. PZ is clearly talking about public school teachers and elected politicians, not academics in the higher education sense, which I believe is what the Johnson quote is talking about. There's no need to defend evolution among such academics, as creationism is a non-entity among them.
So Johnson is sort of correct in one small part of that quote. Evolutionary scientists do hold the power in the relevant science departments at almost all higher learning institutions, if by that one means they're the ones whose work has been so successful and convincing that scarcely anyone in the field disagrees with it. The only people who disagree are those whose reasoning and work are demonstrably deficient. Thus, shockingly, their careers aren't very successful - not because they challenge some hidebound orthodoxy, but because they refuse to be held to even the minimal standards in their field. In a similar fashion, geocentrists "hold the power" in astronomy departments; germ theorists "hold the power" in medical schools; historians who accept the occurrence of the Holocaust "hold the power" in history departments; etc. So what?
wad of id · 30 March 2008
Is it more hypocrisy from these a pseudoChristian to whine about PZ's statement when they endorse the Vise strategy: http://www.designinference.com/documents/2005.11.Vise_Strategy.pdf
Remember that FL?
waldteufel · 30 March 2008
I really can't figure out why you guys are arguing with an ignorant hack like "FL".
He or she is clearly a bible thumper who is impervious to rational thought.
I say let him/her go read his/her Wholly Babble and enjoy.
The DI creationist hacks are not interested in arguing science. They are christian fundies who have as their goal the destruction of science education in America.
Ignorance and servility are what they want to promote.
raven · 30 March 2008
Gary Hurd · 31 March 2008
raven · 31 March 2008
raven · 31 March 2008
Jedidiah Palosaari · 31 March 2008
Ichthyic · 31 March 2008
??? Not sure what you mean. Before my time but I just went by internet documents.
yes, inside issue from long ago.
suffice it to say there was a schism here over the issue that never healed.
for what it's worth, i still think Gary had the right of it (from the PoV that the 'thumb should be taking wrt to the incident), regardless of whatever the details of the case turned out to be afterwards.
Ichthyic · 31 March 2008
I really can’t figure out why you guys are arguing with an ignorant hack like “FL”.
we're not.
he's arguing with himself.
we're just laughing at him.
I say let him/her go read his/her Wholly Babble and enjoy.
the problem is he doesn't enjoy his wholly babble; he insists on coming here to whine on an at least weekly basis. One might almost think he considers this a pulpit or something.
frankly, I've been asking for years that he be auto-booted to the BW (he hasn't said anything honest or original that I've noticed in over a year now), but Pim seems to have grown fond of him for some reason totally unclear to me still.
I hope he doesn't grow fond of Keith, too. I come here less and less as it is.
Ichthyic · 31 March 2008
Of course, it would be preferable for these scientists to willingly subject themselves to reeducation without resort to an Inquisition.
I do keep wishing that these psychos would stop reading 1984 as if it were an instruction manual.
Rolf · 31 March 2008
Frank J · 31 March 2008
Frank J · 31 March 2008
D'Oh!
Disregard my last comment.
I was thinking of DaveScot, not Mike Gene. Though I vaguely recall the latter also conceding a lot to evolution.
Something about those 4-letter names...
phantomreader42 · 31 March 2008
Rrr · 31 March 2008
Rrr · 31 March 2008
Oh carp. I fsck'd my previous comment. Not earth-shattering; just a gentle prod about mistaking geocentrism for the other "tehory" in MPW's otherwise wise comment above.
raven · 31 March 2008
Philip Bruce Heywood · 31 March 2008
Been some time since I visited the old Panda's Thumb, could scarecely recognize it, what with the deluxe format and no sign of Lenny Flank - well, don't rely on me, I didn't see his name with a quick scan. I see from an entry not far at all above here, you are still doing the world a service, keeping some types off the street. Must be cold at night in the northern hemisphere, people stay in -- don't want what happened here in Aus. with that stabbing murder - argument began over origins philosophy, got too hot, booze, lack of sleep, far from home - it's hot here, even at nights. Picking fruit gives you aches if you aren't fit. Magistrate thought the stabbing might have been unintentional. I mean, if anyone takes these differences of opinion to heart,or personally, they have a problem. A man describes himself by the way he writes.
I merely mention in passing by that Phillip Johnson for years has declined to report on my publications; P.Z. Meyers is seemingly in the same category; In scientific terms the Origins Question has been settled for 8yrs; and yes, someone probably is doing someone a service by keeping a non-existent controversy on the go. That dead man's relatives mightn't think so. The uninitiated could visit www.creationtheory.com to discover these facts themselves.
We're constantly updating there and a couple of very gratifying new arrivals have been the HOX genes in fish and the Silicon isotopes, Earth-Moon-Mars-Vesta.
Cheers, everybody - you are arguing over a dead topic.
Rrr · 31 March 2008
c-serpent · 31 March 2008
FL = Fafarman, Larry?
Torbjörn Larsson, OM · 31 March 2008
FL · 31 March 2008
Dale Husband · 31 March 2008
John Kwok · 4 April 2008
Raven,
Here's the information on the Turkish intellectual who was assassinated for a number of reasons, including his acceptance of evolution:
"NCSE Reports, Vol 19, No. 6, Nov/Dec 1999, has three separate articles on Islamic creationism, mostly Turkish. The article that specifically mentions the murdered intellectual who opposed the creationists (I think he was a scientist, but I'm not sure. His name was Ahmet Taner Kisali.) is "Fundamentalist Bedfellows: Political Creationism in Turkey," by Arthur M. Shapiro, pp. 15-17. The NCSE article is a reprint from "The New Leader," Mar/Apr 2000, 83(1): 13-18. And yes, those dates are correct. NCSE's publication schedule is so far behind schedule, that their 1999 Report was indeed published after The New Leader's 2000 issue."
Am quoting from another NCSE member who had sent me this information. Incidentally, Kisali's name is more commonly listed as Kislali.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
John
Jedidiah Palosaari · 4 April 2008
Jedidiah Palosaari · 4 April 2008
(Sorry- I should mention that I had Dr. Murphy's permission to share the previous information.)