Apparently the charge made
on Panda's Thumb that the Institute for Noachian Studies Fellows Dr. Orbin S. Thicke and Rev. Bob-Bob Lee's ground-breaking approach to determining the taxonomic level of the Biblical "kinds" on Noah's Ark is no more than a hoax perpetrated by Dr. Boli has struck a nerve, perhaps even two nerves.
According to this story, spotted by Dr. Boli's clipping service, crack baraminological researchers Thicke and Lee have vehemently denied that their forthcoming book, promised for publication in February 2043, is a hoax.
"We have established a methodology," Dr. Thicke said. "A top-quality study will take some time, which is why we have given ourselves thirty-four years to complete it. There is no need for critics to weigh in before the study is even finished."
"We knew we would face opposition from the satanic atheistic communistic Islamofascist spawn of hell," added the Rev. Bob-Bob. "But a true scientist follows the facts wherever they lead him, as long as they do not lead him outside the pages of Genesis."
It's of note also that another set of theoreticians has weighed in:
Meanwhile, a spokesman for Answers in Hesiod, a classical pagan fundamentalist think tank, strongly condemned the projected study for failing to take into account the scientifically valid theory that Chaos, Gaia, and Eros arose spontaneously from nothing.
Let a thousand flowers bloom for a moment and then die and be woven into leis for ... um. Oh. Sorry. Wrong fantasy. What was it someone once said about open minds and falling brains?
Panda's Thumb spokesbear Professor Steve Steve was unavailable for comment due to a prior commitment with some bamboo stalks in eggnog. But I heard him exclaim as he trundled out of sight, "Happy holidays to all, and to all a good night!"
64 Comments
fnxtr · 24 December 2009
So, is that, like, a metahoax, or something?
Mike Z · 24 December 2009
Right...this reads like a hoax hoax.
John Harshman · 24 December 2009
I still say that Lee & Thicke are hoaxers. If they had really intended to complete their study, they wouldn't have announced a publication date that came after the Rapture. If they're good Christians, they'll be caught up in the air before they can finish. If they aren't, they'll be too busy with the Tribulation to finish.
Meanwhile, hijack a merry Christmas from the Christians, who hijacked Saturnalia from the Romans, and various other pagan solstice festivals from various other folks.
Joe Felsenstein · 24 December 2009
John Harshman · 24 December 2009
Hey, it isn't Dr. Boli's fault. He merely accepted an ad. Since the ad doesn't actually solicit money, it can't be considered fraud.
Wheels · 24 December 2009
This is why I read The Pagan's Thumb.
John Kwok · 24 December 2009
Sounds like the potential plot for Terry Gilliam's next film. Maybe we can get Premise Media to sign on as a co-producer, while the ultimate producing authority lies in the hands of Gilliam, Eric Idle or John Cleese.
SexComb · 25 December 2009
Aren't you taking this thing more seriously than it should be?
Dr. Boli's celebrated magazine is simply a joke, for instance read his bio:
"Today, at the age of 226, Dr. Boli still edits the magazine personally, at a time of life when other men might be considering an honorable retirement. As a concession, however, to his advancing years, he no longer writes every word of the magazine himself. At present he writes every other word, the intervening words being supplied by a well-known agency."
The answer of the authors sound more like a line from South Park, than something a self-appointed scientist would say: "satanic atheistic communistic Islamofascist spawn of hell,"
It's just a joke, nothing to be taken seriously.
RBH · 25 December 2009
snaxalotl · 25 December 2009
SexComb, someone is certainly taking something too seriously. For my part, I'll be strapping on my Christmas sensibilitometer and creeping about the house making "zoop zoop" noises to check for fluctuations in the gravitas field
Migo · 25 December 2009
This reads like those UFO reports from the 60's...
Shane · 25 December 2009
Sounds like these doughty researchers are being libelled, and should take full use of England's libel laws, which seem to have been created (not evolved) specifically for this purpose. I therefore humbly suggest they enlist my lawyer.
John Kwok · 25 December 2009
Stanton · 25 December 2009
fnxtr · 25 December 2009
"Chaos, Gaia, and Eros arose spontaneously from nothing."
I don't know about Gaia, but I've certainly experienced both Chaos and Eros arising spontaneously from nothing. Sometimes together.
fnxtr · 25 December 2009
No! Please don't send me back to the 70's! Anything but that!
(Of course, the 70's also gave us Dark Side of the Moon and Close to the Edge...)
Stanton · 25 December 2009
John Kwok · 25 December 2009
Matt Young · 25 December 2009
raven · 25 December 2009
Butch Pansy · 25 December 2009
John Kwok · 26 December 2009
Frank J · 26 December 2009
Frank J · 26 December 2009
Chritmans? My New Year's resolution (which I'll probably break by 1/2/10) is to use spel chekcer.
Wheels · 26 December 2009
This isn't the no-name decade, it's the noughties!
John Kwok · 26 December 2009
DS · 26 December 2009
The Wrong Reverend said:
“But a true scientist follows the facts wherever they lead him, as long as they do not lead him outside the pages of Genesis.”
There are simply no words to describe how utterly insane this is, so I won't waste any more.
shonny · 26 December 2009
“But a true scientist follows the facts wherever they lead him, as long as they do not lead him outside the pages of Genesis.”
Am - trying -to . . . shit, no, still ROFLMAO!
amphiox · 26 December 2009
Stanton · 26 December 2009
RBH · 26 December 2009
Stanton · 26 December 2009
John Kwok · 26 December 2009
fnxtr · 26 December 2009
Wow that is one mixed bag there, John Kwok. I suppose you'd have The Village People and King Crimson together on your mix tape?
John Kwok · 26 December 2009
Frank J · 27 December 2009
John Kwok · 27 December 2009
Frank J · 27 December 2009
Looks like John's taste is a bit more eclectic than mine, but since Lawrence Welk was mentioned, the song "Calcutta" always takes me back to the first time I heard it - on a plane in 1961.
For whatever reason, my ears just prefer songs recorded over 40-50 years ago. New recordings of old songs tend to hurt my ears me even more than new songs.
I'm also fascinated by the "evolution" of 20th century popular (non-classical) music, whether or not I even like the particular styles. For example I don't have that "inordinate fondness for Beatles" but I'm fascinated with how rapidly their music "evolved" in just a few years.
Wheels · 27 December 2009
I recently got into a bad and, through the magic of buying most of their albums, watched them evolve from early 80s thrash metal to breakthrough success and acclaim as the Trans-Siberian Orchestra.
Frank J · 27 December 2009
fnxtr · 27 December 2009
Heh. I just started getting into big band, even wrote one that the local guys/gals are going to play in the new year. Otherwise I really don't go back much further than The Yardbirds. Well, until you go back to Stravinsky, that is. :-) Oh, and one of the highlights of winter for me, too, is "nutcracker".
Frank J, have you heard the remake of "Constantinople" by They Might Be Giants?
Shebardigan · 27 December 2009
Late to the party as always, /me recently discovered that he could re-create his lost classic Roy Acuff album from 1950 by buying the tunes piecemeal from Amazon at USD0.99 per. Certainly beats finding the vinyl on the web somewhere at a classic auction price.
Speaking of kinds and evolution, Roddy Frame's recent stuff is as appealing as the Aztec Camera corpus from the earlier geologic stratum discussed above.
John Kwok · 27 December 2009
John Kwok · 27 December 2009
Doctor Biobrain · 28 December 2009
Congratulations, Comrade Panda. It is hereby understood that you have been declared a winner in the First Centennial Carnival of the Liberals: Century of the Nihilist Edition Carnival.
Your honor has been duly noted in the records and we thank you for choosing to donate your prize money to the Obama for Life Re-Election Committee. Your contribution of one million dollars will go far towards tilting the Supreme Court in the proper direction. Obama appreciates your affection and wants you to know that he loves you and is very, very proud of you.
All Hail Obama! Obama for Life!
Dave Luckett · 28 December 2009
And a merry Christmas to you, too, oh defender of the faith.
Frank J · 28 December 2009
John Kwok · 28 December 2009
Dan · 28 December 2009
DS · 28 December 2009
John Kwok · 28 December 2009
Stan Polanski · 28 December 2009
(With apologies for taking this thread further off-topic and deeper into musical meanderings.) Frank J, your playlist chimes pretty well with some parts of my musical world. I can't resist tossing in a few things I've been listening to: the Kruger Brothers' "The Suite - Vol 1," Elis Regina and Antonio Carlos Jobim's, "Elis and Tom," and Lockjaw Davis' big band record, "Trane Whistle." I suspect any of these will make your day.
RBH · 28 December 2009
What ever happened to Spike Jones? :)
Frank J · 28 December 2009
Stanton · 28 December 2009
John Kwok · 28 December 2009
Mike Elzinga · 28 December 2009
RBH · 28 December 2009
Mike Elzinga · 28 December 2009
fnxtr · 28 December 2009
The Vancouver suburb of Richmond is built on Lulu Island. True fact.
fnxtr · 28 December 2009
... and yes, I meant "Istanbul". Sorry.
Stanton · 28 December 2009
Frank J · 28 December 2009
fnxtr · 3 January 2010
Thanks for the George Gee link, John.