Big Textbook Vote in Texas Today
The Texas State Board of Education is making the final votes today on their controversial social studies curriculum. This vote will have ramifications across the nations as most K--12 textbooks are written to appease the standards in Texas. The board members are not curriculum experts, but partisan politicians, and have produced a set of social studies standards that seeks to promote a sectarian political viewpoint. Some of you may remember their continual monkeying around with the science standards---no offense to actual monkeys. But it takes some some chutzpa to remove Thomas Jefferson from history standards.
Texas Freedom Network is following today's events.
51 Comments
Doc Bill · 21 May 2010
Ichthyic · 21 May 2010
votes made.
all fell right along party lines.
Texans lose.
*sigh*
Texas school children will learn how Thomas Aquinas fought at the Alamo. Yee, ha!
not far from wrong. evidently, they will be learning how Calvin was the prime motivator of the enlightenment, and Jefferson Davis was the one primarily responsible for the abolition of slavery.
Who was that "Lincoln" guy, anyway
:(
Ichthyic · 21 May 2010
...oh, but hey, I think 'ol Tommy Jefferson made it back in by the skin of his teeth.
I'm sure they figured the kids would confuse him with Jefferson Davis, or something.
Jesse · 21 May 2010
This makes me glad that we kicked their asses at the battle of Glorietta.
MrG · 21 May 2010
John Kwok · 21 May 2010
Reed,
It's chutzpah, not chutzpa. But that's just a slight error. More importantly that today is a sad day in Texan educational history. Hopefully other states won't follow suit, but since Texas is a major purchaser of textbooks, I fear that this may have an adverse impact on the content of history textbooks around the country.
Sincerely,
John
Ichthyic · 21 May 2010
what do people think will be the impact of California's recent attempt to counter Texas?
Jesse · 21 May 2010
robert van bakel · 22 May 2010
I wonder how the invasion of the Soviet Union by Nazi Germany will be treated? It, and the bombing of Pearl Harbor were the nails in the Axis's coffin. I have no doubt Pearl Harbor will be adequitly handled, but what of the titanic tank battle at Kursk; the 900 day siege at Leningrad, the monumental struggle at Stalingrad; oh History, I shudder. After all, Stalin was the Communist Devil (I somewhat agree). To admit that the Nazis broke their back in Russia might be a step too far for these history denying wingnuts.
OgreMkV · 22 May 2010
tupelo · 22 May 2010
At least we know what the limits of human stupidity and dishonesty are. Add in some violence (not their bag, of course) and they'd be in history books - or dictionaries - themselves.
Natman · 22 May 2010
I can't believe that the content of US textbooks and the subject matters covered in US schools is decided on by politicians. Everyone knows politicians care more about getting elected than doing the right thing, so that's following partisan lines and screw the greater good.
*headshakes*
There isn't much left to be proud of in the UK, and it might have serious flaws, but the National Curriculum is a damn good thing.
John Pieret · 22 May 2010
I hate to break it to you Coloradans but you've got another war with Texas coming up. Barry Arrington, ex-Texan, webmaster at Uncommon Descent and self-described as having "a proven track record of conservative activism, cutting taxes, fiscal conservatism, social conservatism and ... an education reformer and passionately pro-life," is running for the Colorado state Board of Education:
http://www.coloradostatesman.com/content/991837-board-education-races-upcoming-three-districts
Lucky you! Arrington promises that pushing ID "is not on his agenda" so you don't have to worry about that, given how honest IDers always are about their motives.
John Kwok · 22 May 2010
Ravilyn Sanders · 22 May 2010
Man! History just cowers and craps in its pants when it meets Texas schoolbooks. Even their warehouse, Texas Schoolbooks Depository Building, in Dallas, TX changes history!
stevaroni · 22 May 2010
OgreMkV · 22 May 2010
Farcall · 22 May 2010
As far as how accurate textbooks are, and "fact Checking" - I had occasion a few years ago to be in an area high school where I live in Indiana. I picked up a World History textbook off a teacher's desk and opened it at random to a page that happened to deal with Roman history.
There, in a little colored box at the top of the page I learned that Julius Caesar was the first Emperor of the HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE.
I decided I must have passed into some kind of "Alternate Universe"...say, maybe that's the problem? Texas exist in an Alternate Universe?
But I still wonder today how many students were taught that incorrect information about Julius Caesar, or did the teacher know enough to correct the error?
My bet is they didn't, but that may just be the attitude of a grumpy old man fed up with stupidity.
Jim Thomerson · 22 May 2010
One can only hope the new history, etc. is taught only as well as math, science and English are taught. I think textbooks should have mistakes, which can be pointed out and considered, to make the point that something printed (much less something posted on the Internet) should not necessarily be accepted at face value. I don't think this is what the Texas revisionists had in mind.
TomS · 22 May 2010
stevaroni · 22 May 2010
Eoraptor013 · 22 May 2010
nmgirl · 22 May 2010
Jesse · 22 May 2010
arigg · 22 May 2010
Harvey Klehr was in the Soviet Union when it fell. A center left historian Harvey was innvited by Yeltsin to view the KGB documents that demonstrate massive extent to which all of you leftists here have your attitudes skewed by materialistic communism. One for One with Venona content. Glenn Beck is conducting a wonderful set of history lessons every friday on his TV show. Learn some history and lose you progressive values.
Jesse · 22 May 2010
What a wonderful disconnect! We are clearly all communists and communism is bad, therefore anything that we believe must be wrong! You have opened my eyes!
</sarcasm> Except that I don't fit the description of communist. I am further from it than most Republicans. And that has nothing to do with whether what is being taught in Texas history classes is consistent with primary documents on the topic(s). I know this is hard for you to swallow, but progressives can, on occasion, have their facts straight. Just so that you know, having the facts straight in a history class is something that should be a goal. It also has nothing to do with whether or not a complete picture of history is going to be taught in Texas history classes. A relatively complete picture that includes both the good and the bad should also be a goal. Try learning the difference between politics and fact. I know, that line has been blurred lately, but you'll be better off in the long run.
stevaroni · 22 May 2010
Just Bob · 22 May 2010
"...the real black helicopter / new world order / tinfoil hat crowd."
Racism. Simple, thinly disguised (sometimes) racism.
There was no Tea Party when there were other DemocratIC presidents. These people weren't organized and foaming at the mouth about "socialism," "taking my guns away'" "President = Hitler" until we elected a president with an African father.
Ask yourself this: Suppose we had elected a Democrat as president, with EXACTLY the same family history as Barack Obama (born in Hawaii, father deserted, etc.), and exactly the same politics and stated goals and policies... BUT instead of Kenyan his father was Swedish and his last name was Halvorsen! Would there be "birthers"? Would there be a Tea Party at all?
He would have political opponents, of course, but nothing like this insanity.
phantomreader42 · 22 May 2010
Jesse · 22 May 2010
The TP is a strange beast indeed. You have your tinfoil hat black chopper types. I hate conspiracy theory people with a passion. If you show up with a conspiracy theory and you don't want me to think that you are lower than whale shit on the bottom of the ocean, you had better have some real evidence to back it up. Or not really be serious. Stupidity or malice are almost always a much better explanation for bad events that transpire.
You also have the religious right trying to take over the TP. The fundamentalists are losing their political grip and the religious right sees the TP as a convenient vehicle to maintain power. If they are successful, the TP will fall apart.
Then you have the genuine "WTF is happening and WTF are we going to experience hyperinflation" types. If the TP survives, they are the ones you want steering the ship. They are going to be the most open to reason and discussion.
waynef43 · 22 May 2010
John Kwok · 23 May 2010
Dale Husband · 23 May 2010
Stanton · 23 May 2010
Isn't it sad that American right-wingers now use the word "progress" as though it were dirty and wrong?
stevaroni · 23 May 2010
Michael J · 23 May 2010
When this has happened in the past, the general population has woken up to kick out the nutters. What are the options if the reasonable Texans wake up to discover that they are yet again a laughing stock?
Stanton · 23 May 2010
seabiscuit · 23 May 2010
John Kwok · 23 May 2010
John Kwok · 23 May 2010
I plead guilty. I am a materialistic Deistic Conservative Republican with very, very pronounced Libertarian leanings who recognizes Charles Darwin and Alfred R. Wallace as my Saints Peter and Paul, along with such notable "saints" like Theodosius Dobzhansky, Ernst Mayr, George Gaylord Simpson, Julian Huxley, and, for the sake of inclusiveness, G. Evelyn Hutchinson, Robert MacArthur and Stephen Jay Gould.
Dale Husband · 23 May 2010
Michael J · 24 May 2010
Michael J · 24 May 2010
McLeroy sorry
Natman · 24 May 2010
What's with the assumption that socialism = communism?
It seems thrown around a lot by certain aspects of American politics, but there's 60 years of European history that shows that socialism =/= communism. And if anything, communism is the ultimate conservatism. Nothing stagnates things more (or retains traditional values, if you want to be semantic) than levelling the playing field and keeping everyone the same. If the biological world was of a communal nature then it would eliminate one of the driving forces behind evolution (to bring things back to more relevant topic).
Ichthyic · 24 May 2010
and, for the sake of inclusiveness, G. Evelyn Hutchinson, Robert MacArthur and Stephen Jay Gould
I'm going to tell Ken Miller you failed to drop his name in this list.
It's obvious you don't love him any more.
Rocket Mike · 24 May 2010
Little Lord McLeroy was defeated in the Republican primary by a conservative but rational Christian Republican. Cynthia Dunbar, one of the other religious regressives, decided not to run and picked an annointed successor who was also beaten in the primary. There is hope for Texas' future, but it didn't come soon enough to stave off this nutty set of education standards. TFN is trying to see that these standards are not implemented in the way the zealots intended. With some help, I believe they can.
RWard · 30 May 2010
Just to be clear - not everyone in Texas is a right-wing ideologue. Progressives have had a strong, vital role in the political discourse of Texas for many years. Ralph Yarborough, LBJ, Ann Richards, Molly Ivens, Jim Hightower and many others have championed a free, well-educated Texas.
AND for our friends in far West Texas (sometimes known as New Mexico), remember that Texas still holds the deed to everything east of The Rio Grande.
stevaroni · 1 June 2010
Henry J · 1 June 2010
Well, at least with Roman numerals you can't get a zero on a math test...
stevaroni · 1 June 2010
Lynn · 3 June 2010