Freshwater: A Teaser
I won't be able to write up the Thursday and Friday hearings for a while, but I have to report this weird occurrence today.
A strange thing happened at the end of the Freshwater hearing today. The Board's attorney, David Millstone, was in recross of Freshwater. He introduced a document, Employer's Exhibit 99, a single sheet of paper with text on both sides and a letterhead I couldn't read from where I was. Freshwater's attorney, R. Kelly Hamilton, immediately interjected that in light of the gag order recently issued by the federal court hearing the civil suit against Freshwater, he would advise Freshwater to answer no questions at all about the Exhibit. After some discussion, the referee, who had not read the gag order yet, decided that before he would rule on whether Freshwater would be allowed (or required) to testify concerning the Exhibit he would have to read the gag order and that Freshwater would have to consult his new attorneys. Recall that the first two attorneys retained by the insurance company successfully petitioned to withdraw a month ago and two new ones were retained a couple of weeks ago. So it was left at that until Freshwater could consult his new attorneys. Since it was 4:30 pm no more testimony was taken today.
After the palaver was done and the hearing was adjourned for the day, I approached the referee and asked if was legal for me to read Employer's Exhibit 99. He looked at me and said, "I don't know if it's legal or illegal, but if you read it you may be into deeper waters than you can get out of." I decided for the moment not to read it.
But I REALLY wonder what it is!
35 Comments
John Vanko · 4 June 2010
This just keeps getting weirder and weirder and weirder!
Maybe some judge will put Hamilton and Freshwater in jail for contempt, without bond.
Divalent · 4 June 2010
Is there an online version of the "gag order"? It would be interesting to see exactly what it states.
RBH · 4 June 2010
Doc Bill · 4 June 2010
More delay.
Freshwater has to realize that this chapter is coming to a close and it's not going to be good for him. Strip away all the fluff and distractions and two facts remain:
1. Freshwater put a mark on a kid's arm. Freshwater admitted this; it's not in doubt.
2. Freshwater wrote that he was not removing his bible from his classroom and if that was insubordinate, so be it.
It seems to me that Freshwater's main "problem" is his inability to admit he was wrong. If he had apologized to the Dennis family and been more cooperative with his administration I'm certain he would still be teaching creationism under the radar, but he'd still have a job.
Somewhat off topic, when I was in high school there was an eccentric biology teacher who "required" students to either pick up a live scorpion or handle a tarantula. He was a very popular teacher. I don't know how many students during his 30-year tenure were stung, although I never heard of a single case even through folklore, but I'm sure he would have fallen all over himself to make it right if that happened. If anything, students praised him for helping them overcome their natural fear of creepy crawlies.
Hieronymus Fortesque Lickspittle · 4 June 2010
When FreshH20 is fired I'll bet he becomes a regular on the Glenn Beck show.
mario · 4 June 2010
A gag order is better excuse that two flat tires. Can't wait until Monday to hear what was in that form though.
Divalent · 4 June 2010
The gag order: "Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to not disclose or to permit others to disclose any of the confidential settlement negotiations that have been or will be exchanged in this action."
Based on the above, presumably the answer to the question asked of him would have disclosed something about the confidential settlement negotiations that have (or will be) exchanged between the parties in the Federal suit (as that is the only topic covered by the gag order).
Liz Lemon · 4 June 2010
What the what?!
robert van bakel · 4 June 2010
Well, thanks for the link to the National Center for Science Education; I've never been.
That second paragraph (please read, it's brilliant) explains why we fight, it is plain and simple, this man is a menace to education. I say 'we', I mean you, RBH; don't blush. These pricks must be nailed, by rationality, by the facts, by the law, and by science. Fuck them!
robert van bakel · 4 June 2010
Don't want to distract from PEN1 Freshwater (Public Enemy Number 1) but I think 'Uncommon Descent' should rename themselves 'bornagain77-Descent'. His screeds are tireless. Good Day peoples.
Jesse · 4 June 2010
I would have read the thing, given the opportunity.
RBH · 5 June 2010
Yeah, it was hard not to, but you didn't see the referee's face and hear the tone of his voice. I don't want to take on an already pissed off federal judge.
RBH · 5 June 2010
Jesse · 5 June 2010
Jesse · 5 June 2010
Furthermore, as you describe it, they weren't scared until Hamilton connected the document with the gag order.
RBH · 5 June 2010
CMB · 5 June 2010
RBH · 5 June 2010
Jesse · 5 June 2010
co · 5 June 2010
Just want to say that this is fascinating for me (for whom the law is a murky, roiling Pit of Death). Thanks for the coverage and suspense, RBH.
harold · 5 June 2010
Doc Bill -
Many species of scorpion and virtually all tarantulas are relatively harmless, except for potential allergic reactions or irritating but not-very-harmful defense mechanisms.
Stanton · 5 June 2010
John_S · 5 June 2010
Gary Hurd · 5 June 2010
Thanks for the update. This is how Alice felt when she dove down the rabbit hole.
Re: tarantulas, they are quite capable of biting, but won't unless injured. Some children are allergic to the spider's hair, and develop a contact dermatitis. Some 30 years ago, I was doing a little "nature talk" with a bunch of kids and 3 tarantulas. One of the critters got lost- it crawled up the cuff of my pants to about the knee before I felt it. I had an associate blow cigarette smoke up my leg which knocked the spider out cold.
RBH · 5 June 2010
Jesse · 5 June 2010
W. H. Heydt · 6 June 2010
IANAL. If the exhibit has been entered as evidence, then it is part of the record. Unless someone asks to seal the exhibit, it is part of the public record. As such, anyone should be able to read it with no issues.
If it happens to bear on issues subject to the gag order, then things could get interesting. Especially since Millstone is not, so far as I can tell, subject to the gag order. Millstone should be totally uninterested in any settlement talks in the Federal case, since his job is to represent the Board (no longer a party to the Federal case) and is neither a party nor a legal representative of any party with regard to the Federal case.
Personally, I think Hamilton is blowing smoke over the exhibit and there is something in there will blow large holes in Freshwater's side of the admin hearing.
--W. H. Heydt
Old Used Programmer
RBH · 6 June 2010
Jesse · 6 June 2010
I didn't mean to imply that what you are reporting is crap, just that Hamilton and Freshwater are experts and geniuses when it comes to generating crap from any source.
Ralph · 6 June 2010
RBH · 6 June 2010
I've learned just what the mysterious Board Exhibit 99 is. It's an affidavit signed by Freshwater concerning (among other things) the classroom material he obtained from the administration some time in the summer of 2008 and how (or whether) it was disposed of. I'm trying now to get a copy of the affidavit. Re-reading the gag order, the affidavit does not appear to me to fall within its scope, at least as far as I now know the affidavit's contents, so Jesse appears to be correct: This is yet another delaying tactic by Hamilton.
RBH · 6 June 2010
Jon H · 7 June 2010
Doc Bill wrote: "“required” students to either pick up a live scorpion or handle a tarantula. He was a very popular teacher. I don’t know how many students during his 30-year tenure were stung, although I never heard of a single case even through folklore"
In addition to what others wrote, above, the species of scorpion most often sold in pet stores is one that has a fairly mild sting that it rarely uses, mostly relying on its pincers instead.
eric · 7 June 2010
RBH · 7 June 2010