Here we report the generation of four self-sustaining clonal lineages of a tetraploid species resulting from fertilization of triploid oocytes from a parthenogenetic Aspidoscelis exsanguis with haploid sperm from Aspidoscelis inornata. Molecular and cytological analysis confirmed the genetic identity of the hybrids and revealed that the females retain the capability of parthenogenetic reproduction characteristic of their triploid mothers. The tetraploid females have established self-perpetuating clonal lineages which are now in the third generation.Read more at Nobel Intent, to which we tip our hat.
Laboratory synthesis of an independently reproducing vertebrate species
The TalkOrigins Archive has two articles (here and here) on observed instances of speciation. Now a recent PNAS paper describes speciation in Aspidoscelis, a genus of whiptail lizards. The paper is titled "Laboratory synthesis of an independently reproducing vertebrate species." From the abstract:
21 Comments
kay · 6 May 2011
Does this count as intelligent design? :P
ted · 6 May 2011
Unisex species would seem to be a good test of evolution since they would very high uniformity because of the extreme founder effect (whole species literally born from a single female: "eve"). All variation would be from mutation and variants would be separated into different lineages. Are there any good studies of this?
Karen S. · 6 May 2011
Still a lizard! blah blah blah.
eric · 6 May 2011
Stanton · 6 May 2011
Do they make good pets?
fnxtr · 6 May 2011
Cue "artificial selection" argument...
DS · 6 May 2011
eric · 6 May 2011
Karen S. · 6 May 2011
Gary Hurd · 6 May 2011
Worth noting I'll need to update Emergence of New Species.
Henry J · 6 May 2011
RBH · 6 May 2011
Gary Hurd · 6 May 2011
Wheels · 6 May 2011
Paul Burnett · 7 May 2011
John Kwok · 9 May 2011
Gary,
Here's an excellent list of parthenogenesis in lizards courtesy of Greg Meyer over at Jerry Coyne's blog:
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2010/11/19/hybridization-and-parthenogenesis-in-whiptail-lizards/
Sincerely,
John
fusilier · 9 May 2011
Apparently the Rev. Dr. John C "Jonathon" Wells has something over on Evolution Lies and Deceit about this being an example of something called secondary speciation. Only primary speciation is evolutiona which has never been observed, blahblahblah ....
fusilier, who can't force himslf to find a linkie to that MIP site
James 2:24
Science Avenger · 9 May 2011
Mike Elzinga · 9 May 2011
Jim Thomerson · 10 May 2011
http://books.google.com/books?id=WJroDYfiCqkC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91&dq=Cole+A+Lizard+foretold+Allan+markezich&source=bl&ots=mnaVx9JziA&sig=jcTA1mEMb3AV56AGJPxZ55v2BCc&hl=en&ei=KpnJTbbLMtPAtgeas4X-Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Cole%20A%20Lizard%20foretold%20Allan%20markezich&f=false
Sorry, this is as close as I could get you to a reference. Basic story is that there was a parthenogenetic lizard in Amazonas State, Venezuela. It was thought that the species G. cryptus was the founding father, but this could not be supported by study of preserved material.
Allan Markezich hitched a plane ride with me into the interior of Amazonas. We were down by the river catching killifish (what my NSF grant was for, grant cited in the lizard paper acknowledgments) and Allan caught these lizards in litter along the water's edge. He knew what they were, and got some back alive for chromosome study, which supported the hypothesis that they were the male parent of the parthenogenetic species.
Henry J · 11 May 2011
But it's still a lizard, even if it can't find a date for Friday night. :)