Photography contest, third edition?

Posted 9 May 2011 by

I think this is sort of like an open letter to our readers: We are thinking of running a third photography contest in the summer. The theme of the first contest, which was frankly decided in arrears, was animal, mineral, and vegetable. The theme of the second contest was threatened, endangered, and invasive. Would anyone like to suggest a theme for a third contest?

59 Comments

wright1 · 9 May 2011

Coast, mountains and desert.

Henry J · 9 May 2011

Plant, animal, fungus.

TomS · 9 May 2011

Solid, liquid, gas, plasma. Or earth, water, air, fire.

LadyRhian · 9 May 2011

Flying, swimming, walking/crawling/burrowing

OgreMkV · 9 May 2011

Science in action...

OgreMkV · 9 May 2011

or (and Henry reminded me of this)

"Spores, mold, and fungus"

Reed A. Cartwright · 9 May 2011

Red, White, and Blue.

Just Bob · 9 May 2011

Evolution in action.

Think about it.

Daffyd ap Morgen · 9 May 2011

Diverse, Adaptable, Mutable

William · 9 May 2011

Beauty, Power, "Tooth and Claw".
Or Producer, Herbivore, Carnivore.

fnxtr · 9 May 2011

Larry, Moe, and Curly.

fnxtr · 9 May 2011

I'm not helping, am I.

Alan R. · 9 May 2011

Fact or Fiction.

or

Never seen before.

OgreMkV · 9 May 2011

cryptozoology!

Henry J · 9 May 2011

Penguins from various continents.

Wheels · 9 May 2011

Pangolins I Have Known.

Wait, that's been done.

Hmm... Not What It Seems?

Matt Young · 9 May 2011

I’m not helping, am I.

Well, no, not exactly - though if you had better taste you might have said Groucho, Harpo, and Chico, or even Gert, Al, and Ep (hope I do not open a floodgate). But remember when suggesting categories that we do not want to rule out any natural entity, so coast, mountains, and desert is inclusive (if we count stars as mountains, anyway), whereas plant, animal, and fungus leaves out a whole lot of minerals.

Matt Young · 9 May 2011

Sorry - Gert, Ep, and Ein.

Doc Bill · 9 May 2011

My cat.

Oh, my bad, I thought I was commenting on Coyne's site!

How about Fire, Earth, Air and Water.

Bob M · 9 May 2011

This comment has been moved to The Bathroom Wall.

Vince · 9 May 2011

Stinging, biting, or other naturally irritating organisms.

OR

Petrified students (sorry, just got finished with the last of our senior seminar presentations...)

Paul Burnett · 9 May 2011

How about restricting by size? Microphotographs or extreme close-ups of stuff - as opposed to landscapes or astrophotographs or large animals, vegetables or macro-minerals.

Just Al · 10 May 2011

[Rubs hands] Okay, lessee, here...

Artistic, Informative, Intriguing.

Backyard, Local (state/province/within 50 klicks, whatever), Abroad.

Young (less than a week), Old (over five hundred years), and Mature (in between those two).

Fleeting (exposures 1/500 second and faster), Plodding (exposures over 5 seconds), and Walking (in between).

Permanence, Transition, and Change[d].

Just Met (first image of subject by photographer), Hangs About (seen from time to time), and Family (frequent exposure).

Work, School, and Play.

That's a start. Let me think on this a bit...

cronk · 10 May 2011

Intelligent Design in Action.
(chirping crickets?)

Henry J · 10 May 2011

walking, running, swimming, flying, slithering, crawling, burrowing, etc.

eric · 10 May 2011

Tool use, interspecies cooperation, and intraspecies cooperation.

I would've also included language use, but that isn't really photogenic.

Henry J · 10 May 2011

I would’ve also included language use, but that isn’t really photogenic.

Unless it's a gorilla using sign language. :)

Mike Elzinga · 10 May 2011

Henry J said:

I would’ve also included language use, but that isn’t really photogenic.

Unless it's a gorilla using sign language. :)
Like this?

fnxtr · 10 May 2011

Paul Burnett said: How about restricting by size? Microphotographs or extreme close-ups of stuff - as opposed to landscapes or astrophotographs or large animals, vegetables or macro-minerals.
Ooo! Micro/macro! Salt crystals and globular clusters, fly eyes and supernovae... though that's beyond the abilities of the average photographer, innit.

fnxtr · 10 May 2011

Matt Young said:

I’m not helping, am I.

Well, no, not exactly - though if you had better taste you might have said Groucho, Harpo, and Chico, or even Gert, Al, and Ep (hope I do not open a floodgate).
There was a 5th Marx Brother (after Zeppo), but no-one ever talks about him. Tall guy. They called him Stretch.

harold · 10 May 2011

How about photographic proof of The Designer in action, pinning a flagellum on a bacterium?

Henry J · 10 May 2011

Or even just a tail on a donkey!

Henry J · 10 May 2011

Mike Elzinga said:
Henry J said:

I would’ve also included language use, but that isn’t really photogenic.

Unless it's a gorilla using sign language. :)
Like this?
Close enough!

Jowl · 10 May 2011

Lions, tigers and bears (oy vey!)

Sam Caddick · 11 May 2011

Natural, manipulated, impossible?

Henry J · 11 May 2011

Designed or not designed? :D

JASONMITCHELL · 11 May 2011

Karl?

JASONMITCHELL · 11 May 2011

fnxtr said:
Matt Young said:

I’m not helping, am I.

Well, no, not exactly - though if you had better taste you might have said Groucho, Harpo, and Chico, or even Gert, Al, and Ep (hope I do not open a floodgate).
There was a 5th Marx Brother (after Zeppo), but no-one ever talks about him. Tall guy. They called him Stretch.
let's try that again... Karl?

Just Bob · 11 May 2011

Clear evidence of design: teenie-weenie trademark or copyright symbols, brand logos, patent numbers, etc. on flagella, DNA strands, etc.

IOW, fun with Photoshop.

alicejohn · 11 May 2011

In honor of the U. S Navy SEAL Team for the killing of Osama bin Laden and the end of the War on Terror: SEa, Air, Land

mrg · 11 May 2011

5th Marx brother was Milton "Gummo" Marx. He never played in the movies and so is even less known than Zeppo, the fourth brother, who got the straight man roles and so is generally forgotten.

William Young · 11 May 2011

There was a 5th Marx bother and he was called Gummo.

Cubist · 12 May 2011

Hmmm... "solid, liquid, gas" has already been suggested, so I guess you could count this as a second vote for that one. Alternately...
Diurnal, Nocturnal, Crepuscular (aka Day, Night, Twilight)
Interior, Exterior, Surface
Life, Death, Undeath
Smooth, Varying, Chaotic

james · 12 May 2011

Inside, outside, & Upside-down.

I liked the idea of short, medium & long exposures.

This, that, and the other thing. Maybe not.

Right way, Wrong way, & My way. Definitely not.

Randy · 12 May 2011

How about Earth, Wind & Fire (think they still tour), seriously...

How about meteorological?

harold · 12 May 2011

Randy said: How about Earth, Wind & Fire (think they still tour), seriously... How about meteorological?
confirmed

Matchstick · 12 May 2011

Past, present and future ?

wright1 · 12 May 2011

Cubist said: Alternately... Diurnal, Nocturnal, Crepuscular
Ooh, I do like that, Cubist. I hope they go with it.

O.R. Pagan · 12 May 2011

How about interesting mutations/malformations in plants or animals?

(not humans; too sensitive a matter . . . )

I cannot help to suggest a subtitle for this topic: "Intelligent design my a** . . ."
(:-)] . . . .

Henry J · 12 May 2011

Alternately… Diurnal, Nocturnal, Crepuscular (aka Day, Night, Twilight)

Would Rod Serling narrate it?

Dave Luckett · 13 May 2011

Bewitched, bothered and bewildered?

Kevin B · 13 May 2011

Dave Luckett said: Bewitched, bothered and bewildered?
Is this thread just degenerating into a collection of things that go round in threes? If so, my current bedtime reading has got Rakata, Danan and Perboewatan in it, but they won't provide many photo-opportunities....

Marilyn · 15 May 2011

Engineering, Industry, Gems, Caves, Waterfall, Domestic Pet, Zoo, Safari Park, Wildlife.

Nomad · 15 May 2011

So I'm trying to think of some sort of vague collection of terms that could be considered evolution related. I've been trying to come up with a series of variations on the concept of change. For a group of three, I've got this:

fast change,slow change,stasis

That's intentionally vague, with no clear line between the three and plenty of room to creatively apply the concepts to different aspects of the same thing. But that's what I was trying to do, make for categories that let the contestants have some fun with the groupings.

You might call a picture of a bullfrog hiding in the water with only its eyes and nostrils showing stasis, as it waits for a food source to wander into ambush range. A picture of a frog species that's threatened by Chytridiomycosis might be termed fast change because of the threat of extinction, a sudden event in terms of the history of a species.

Gerald · 16 May 2011

To make it challenging why not photography of things we usually don't see

"Shorter than violet, longer than red"

JimboK · 17 May 2011

Liquid, Solid, Gas???

Mike Elzinga · 17 May 2011

Infinite, infinitesimal, and invisible.

Henry J · 17 May 2011

Infinite, infinitesimal, and invisible.

I'm not sure just how photogenic anything in those categories would be! ;) Henry

Bane · 21 May 2011

I suggest enigmatic,incredible and amazing.I think these words capture the beauty of nature.