I expected a Booby joke by now, maybe a pun cascade. :(
Henry J · 20 April 2012
If you want to milk this for puns, then start one! ;)
Jay · 28 April 2012
When we see this beautiful bird, The atheist Richard Dawkins thinks that "unguided natural processes can account for the origin of biological information - no external source of information is necessary." On the Contrary, Intelligent Design philosopher William Dembski thinks that "a non-deterministic law of conservation of information in the sense that, although natural processes involving only chance and necessity can effectively transmit complex specified information, they cannot generate it." which one is more resonable?
Matt Young · 28 April 2012
Please continue to ignore the Jay troll, who apparently has some fascination with bird photographs.
5 Comments
KlausH · 17 April 2012
Show us your Tits!
KlausH · 20 April 2012
I expected a Booby joke by now, maybe a pun cascade. :(
Henry J · 20 April 2012
If you want to milk this for puns, then start one! ;)
Jay · 28 April 2012
When we see this beautiful bird, The atheist Richard Dawkins thinks that "unguided natural processes can account for the origin of biological information - no external source of information is necessary." On the Contrary, Intelligent Design philosopher William Dembski thinks that "a non-deterministic law of conservation of information in the sense that, although natural processes involving only chance and necessity can effectively transmit complex specified information, they cannot generate it." which one is more resonable?
Matt Young · 28 April 2012
Please continue to ignore the Jay troll, who apparently has some fascination with bird photographs.